• Tanglewood Lakes dam holds beautiful fall colors this week. Thank you to Sean Swartz for the photo. If you have a photo you’d like to share it, along with your info, to Barbara at linncountynewsreporter@gmail. com. Remember, Out on the Gravel photos will be used for this years’ calendar! Keep an eye out for your chance to vote on our cover!

  • Travelers here don’t worry about their doors being dinged by cars parked next to them. The engine of the buggy, the horse, stood patiently waiting for his owners to return.

  • The 2026 Pleasanton Homecoming King and Queen are Anthony Sousley and Olive Skipper, joining them are crownbearers Waylon Marsh and Inez Easley.

  • he Mound City Historical Society, in conjunction with the Material Girls Quilting Guild of Linn County, held a quilt show at the Mound City Historical Park over the weekend. The raffle item was a patriotic quilt made and donated by the quilt guild. The lucky winner was Chasity Ware.

  • The Jolly Market, located at Jayhawk Linn High School, also saw large crowds this weekend. Vendors filled the main gym and commons area.

  • Mound City’s own Jayhawk Linn Junior High and High School marching band, directed by Rachel Wilson, plays patriotic music as they make their way through town.

  • Children scurry to gather handfuls of candy at the beginning of the parade.

  • Saturday’s annual Sugar Mound Arts and Crafts parade featured a patriotic theme, in honor of America’s 250th birthday this year. Grand marshals for the parade included local veterans who have participated in Honor Flight Network.

  • Tanner Holt and Alison Willard are Jayhawk’s 2026 Homecoming King and Queen. Left to right: Coralynn Bukkila, Landon Higgins, Aubreigh Summers, Dominic Alvarez, Queen Alison Willard, King Tanner Holt, Chloe Riley, and Rayse Dean. Crownbearers are Kyndall Cummings and Korbin Cleland.

  • Alison Willard, Chloe Riley and Coralynn Bukkila cheer in their Jayhawk Linn Homecoming candidate formal gowns after Willard was crowned queen.

NEWS

Judge Ward retires, committee interviews new candidates

thumb

6th Judicial District Nominating Commission announces interview schedule   TOPEKA—The 6th Judicial District Nominating Commission convened at 9 a.m. Tuesday, Oct. 27, to interview applicants to fill a district judge vacancy. The judicial vacancy was created... [More]

Commissioners discuss truck purchase options

thumb

  Linn County News linncountynewsreporter@gmail.com   During the meeting on Monday, Oct. 26, the Linn County Commissioners held a discussion with Public Works Administrator JD Handly regarding the purchase of a pickup truck. Handly stated that he does... [More]

Commissioners approve application for transportation grant

thumb

  Linn County News linncountynewsreporter@gmail.com   The Linn County Commissioners met in regular session on Monday, Oct. 26, and during that meeting they heard a brief report from Transportation Director Amanda Brown on a grant application for Linn County... [More]

More News

SPORTS

Pleasanton football falls to Chase County

thumb

LINN COUNTY NEWS holtadam82@yahoo.com   The Pleasanton football team played their final regular season game as they hosted district opponent Chase County on Oct. 23.  Chase County was the one seed in the Jays district and a win over the Jays would ensure them... [More]

Jayhawk cross country qualifies boys’ varsity team and Meyer for State

thumb

LINN COUNTY NEWS holtadam82@yahoo.com   It was a good day for the Jayhawk Linn cross country team as they traveled to the 2A Sub-State at Alma on Oct. 24. The Hawks did well as everyone of their boys’ runners placed in the top 21 to place first overall at the... [More]

Prairie View cross country competes at 3A Sub-State

thumb

LINN COUNTY NEWS holtadam82@yahoo.com   Prairie View cross country brought their varsity girls’ team to 3A Sub-State at Fredonia on Oct. 24. The Lady Buffs ran in group A at Sub-State. The girls ran hard but none of them qualified for the 3A State tournament... [More]

More Sports

Rebates

Bahhh, on rebates. What a gimmick.

Every time I see a rebate on a product, I wonder why the manufacturer doesn’t just put the product on sale.

But no, we, the purchasing public, have to jump through hoops to get money back from the manufacturer, or distributor, that they promise in the form of savings.

My dislike of rebates is not a new one. Bless my vet’s heart that they fill out the rebate forms on pet meds for me; that saves me from the stacks of rebate cards that were on my desk losing value every single month they sat there.

Now, they fill them out for me – seems simple, but on the to-do list of life, filling out rebate forms is/was on a negative scale of importance…unless it’s really big money.

Frustration with the system came in mass when I built my house. I purchased my cabinets over President’s Day and saved big money – the savings were to come back in the form of a rebate from Lowe’s. Easy-peezy, right? Not so much. There were a few thousand dollars in rebate I was dealing with – so I filled out the form pronto, sent the receipts to their rebate center, and waited.

Nothing – for almost a year; despite multiple calls and follow-ups to the company. Finally, I got hold of someone and shock shock, their computer system crashed and they had lost all of the information during that time period.

Luckily, I made copies of everything and resubmitted it; finally, I received my rebate check – literally, a year after the purchase.

The other day, I made my periodic purchase of chicken, horse and deer food; well, the deer corn had a $5 rebate on the $9 per bag purchase. So, I filled out the paperwork and sent it in.

What makes my head spin is how many people don’t fill out the paperwork. 

According to Level6.com, rebate redemption is low. “There is no universal benchmark; the right consumer rebate redemption rate varies dramatically by claim mechanic, from roughly 30% for low-value mail-in offers to well above 50% for frictionless digital and instant formats. Below we break down realistic ranges by offer type so you can benchmark against the right comparison set rather than an industry-wide average.”

So, take my $9 deer corn. If they sell 100 bags of corn, that is $900. The distributor sends $500 back to consumers, leaving them with $400 – if 100 percent of buyers send in the rebate form.

Well, if the statistic is accurate that 30 percent of people send in rebates, that equates to $270 returned to consumers leaving the distributor with $230 more in their pocket, netting them $630.

Small potatoes? Not so much when you multiply every retailer out there that has some kind of rebate form that the consumer has to send in, email or QR code for. Many Americans don’t have the ability or capability to do some rebates leaving them at full retail price.

My dad, for instance, would no way be able to handle an online rebate form. How many other adults in our nation are in the same boat?

Just put the product on sale! Rebates are a scam to lessen the impact of a sale on a manufacturer – and a pain for the consumer.

OPINIONS

What Is It?

thumb

America’s founding fathers talked a lot about virtue. Freedom requires it; there can be no liberty without virtue, they said. “Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious People,” insisted John Adams. “It is wholly inadequate to the government... [More]

More Opinions

LETTERS POLICY

Linn County News encourages letters to the editor. They may be mailed, emailed, faxed or hand-delivered. To be published, the letter must:
• Be hand signed.
• Include writer's name, city and phone number as letters will be verified for authenticity.
• Be 500 words or less.
• Be received by 5 p.m. Monday to appear in that week's edition.
• We reserve the right to print or not print reader's contributions.
No malicious, slanderous or threatening letters will be allowed.

View Legals for Free